Presentations

=This is the presentations page=


 * || Lesson 1 || Lesson 2 ||  ||   ||
 * || [[file:The ToK Presentation.pptx]] || [[file:TKPPD_Presentation_planning_document.pdf]]

This form must be filled out prior to the presentation ||  ||   || Understanding Knowledge Issues ||  ||   ||
 * ||  || [[file:Understanding Knowledge Issues.pdf]]
 * || [[file:TOK Presentation Checklist.pdf]] ||  ||   ||   ||
 * || ==Nervous presentation==
 * || [[file:TOK Presentation Checklist.pdf]] ||  ||   ||   ||
 * || ==Nervous presentation==
 * || ==Nervous presentation==
 * || ==Nervous presentation==

media type="youtube" key="-KpLPy22rjQ" height="315" width="560" || ==Movie==

media type="youtube" key="UL6tCVr3tbw" height="315" width="420" ||  ||   || media type="youtube" key="qG1GCC0yBlk" height="315" width="420" ||  ||   ||   ||
 * || ==Make your own mind up on this one!!!==

Other videos to look at [] @http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&feature=endscreen&v=KsN_N6gAiJU  @http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&feature=endscreen&v=ex8ySoyfqCU Done by teachers with instructions on what is good and bad in the presentation [] []

=Assessment Criteria=

**Criteria A** Identification of knowledge issue
• Did the presentation identify a relevant knowledge issue involved, implicit or embedded in a real-life situation
 * === Descriptor === || === Achievement level === ||
 * 0 || Level 1 was not achieved. ||
 * 1–2 || The presentation referred to a knowledge issue but it was irrelevant to the real-life situation under consideration. ||
 * 3-4 || The presentation identified a knowledge issue that was in some ways relevant to the real-life situation under consideration. ||
 * 5 || The presentation identified a knowledge issue that was clearly relevant to the real-life situation under consideration. ||


 * B Treatment of knowledge issues**

• Did the presentation show a good understanding of knowledge issues, in the context of the real-life situation
 * === Descriptor === || === Achievement level === ||
 * 0 || Level 1 was not achieved. ||
 * 1–2 || The presentation showed some understanding of knowledge issues. ||
 * 3–4 || The presentation showed an adequate understanding of knowledge issues. ||
 * 5 || The presentation showed a good understanding of knowledge issues. ||


 * C Knower's perspective**

• Did the presentation, particularly in the use of arguments and examples, show an individual approach and demonstrate the significance of the topic?
 * === Achievement level === || === Descriptor === ||
 * 0 || Level 1 was not achieved. ||
 * 1–2 || The presentation, in its use of arguments and examples or otherwise, showed limited personal involvement and did not demonstrate the significance of the topic. ||
 * 3–4 || The presentation, in its use of arguments and examples or otherwise, showed some personal involvement and adequately demonstrated the significance of the topic. ||
 * 5 || The presentation, in its distinctively personal use of arguments and examples or otherwise, showed clear personal involvement and fully demonstrated the significance of the topic. ||


 * Criteria D Connections**

• Did the presentation give a balanced account of how the topic could be approached from different perspectives?

• Did the presentation show how the positions taken on the knowledge issues would have implications in related areas?

• In awarding the higher achievement levels, the emphasis should be more on the quality of the consideration of connections than on the quantity of connections mentioned.


 * === Descriptor === || === Achievement level === ||
 * 0 || Level 1 was not achieved. ||
 * 1–2 || The presentation explored at least two different perspectives to some extent. ||
 * 3–4 || The presentation gave a satisfactory account of how the question could be approached from different perspectives, and began to explore their similarities and differences. ||
 * 5 || The presentation gave a clear account of how the question could be approached from different perspectives and considered their implications in related areas. ||